Carnes v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The obvious purpose of the incest statute is to address the evil of sexual intercourse between persons who are related to each other within specific degrees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Anderson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-09· cited 19×
• Gary G. Debaun v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2017-03-16· cited 18×
• Beam v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-23· cited 4×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Baker
  California Supreme Court· 1968-07-15· cited 63×
• Singh v. Singh
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-02-06· cited 32×
• State v. Wyman
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1887-02-15· cited 21×
• Ferre v. State Ex Rel. Reno
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-13· cited 18×
• State v. Craig
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1994-01-21· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Ashey
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1924-02-29· cited 10×