Carnation Company v. T.U. Parks Construction Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining effect of failing to assert compulsory counterclaim under Tennessee rule identical to Rule 13(a)
• ‘‘the waiver or April 12, 2022 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 65 342 Conn. 815 APRIL, 2022 833 Chugh v. Kalra estoppel theory [underlying rule 13 (a)] allows more discretion not to hold [that a] claim is barred [when] to do so is manifestly unjust’’
• “In Erie Railroad, the Court held that the federal district court was required, under a proper interpretation of the Judiciary Act of 1789 and, indeed, by the Constitution, to apply the law of the state in which it sits in resolving questions of substantive law.”
• “In Erie Railroad, the Court held that the federal district court was required, under a proper interpretation of the Judiciary Act of 1789 and, indeed, by the Constitution, to apply the law of the state in which it sits in resolving questions of substantive law.”
• “In Erie Railroad, the Court held that the federal district court was required, under a proper interpretation of the Judiciary Act of 1789 and, indeed, by the Constitution, to apply the law of the state in which it sits in resolving questions of substantive law.”
• “[I]n some cases in which a claim is held to be barred the doctrine of res judicata does not fit and . . . the waiver or estoppel theory allows more discretion not to hold the claim is barred where to do so is manifestly unjust.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).