Carnation Co. v. Pacific Westbound Conference

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismissal under primary jurisdiction doctrine is not appropriate if \dismissal would ... prejudice the plaintiff's right to obtain antitrust relief at the appropriate time\
• recognizing that collective rate-making activities should not be immunized from antitrust scrutiny unless there is “plain repugnancy between the antitrust and regulatory provisions” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• holding that dismissal under primary jurisdiction doctrine is not appropriate if “dismissal would ... prejudice the plaintiffs right to obtain antitrust relief at the appropriate time”
• noting that award of treble antitrust damages would not interfere with future action by regulatory agency
• noting that award of treble antitrust damages would not interfere with future action by regulatory agency
• noting that award of treble antitrust damages would not interfere with future action by regulatory agency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).