Carmody v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that without “evidence of a single hour worked over forty hours that did not receive overtime wages or flextime, the [employees’] unsupported estimations of the unpaid hours due are not enough.”
• explaining that it was not error for district court to consider the “balancing test we previously found helpful to evaluate the admissibility of evidence a party did not properly disclose”
• affirming grant of summary judgment to employer because employees offered no “record evidence of a single hour worked over forty hours that did not receive overtime wages or flextime” and their “unsupported estimations of the unpaid hours are not enough”
• “Anderson [v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.] only applies where the existence of damages is certain. . . . Anderson allows uncertainty only for the amount of damages.”
• “Anderson only applies where the existence of damages is certain. Anderson allows uncertainty only for the amount of damages.”
• “Anderson only applies where the existence of damages is certain. Anderson allows uncertainty only for the amount of damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).