Skip to main content
· 6/5/1995

Carmine Casella v. Equifax Credit Information Services, and Trans Union Corporation

Citations

  • 56 F.3d 469
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13749
  • 1995 WL 332382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that FCRA plaintiff must show \causation between the harm alleged\ and the \alleged violation[] of the FCRA\
  • noting that “‘actual damages’ may include humiliation and mental distress, even in the absence of out-of-pocket expenses.”
  • affirming summary judgment for defendants where plaintiff failed to show that his mental distress was caused by defendants’ action
  • rejecting the plaintiffs contention that he was entitled to emotional distress damages “simply because he knew of an inaccurate and potentially damaging item in his credit report”
  • discussing the plaintiff’s failure to present “evidence” that the credit reporting agency defendants caused his pain and suffering
  • affirming grant of summary judgment where plaintiff failed to show causation between the harm alleged and defendants’ alleged FCRA violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Van Graafeiland Coffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.