Carmie Watkins v. L.M. Berry & Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The phrase ‘in the ordinary course of business’ cannot be expanded to mean anything that interests a company.”
• \The phrase 'in the ordinary course of business' cannot be expanded to mean anything that interests a company.\
• “It is for the trier of fact to determine at what point the telephone should have been hung up.”
• The trier of fact determines the scope of the consent to determine whether the intercepted message exceeds the consent.
• “It is the task of the trier of fact to determine the scope of consent and to decide whether and to what extent the interception exceeded that consent.”
• “We can think of no reason why consent ... cannot be limited. We therefore hold that consent within the meaning of [§ -] 2511(2)(d) is not necessarily an all or nothing proposition; it can be limited”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).