Carmichael v. Verso Paper, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• When the “adequacy of the foundation for the expert testimony is at issue, the law favors vigorous cross-examination over exclusion”
• When the “adequacy of the foundation for the expert testimony is at issue, the law favors vigorous cross-examination over exclusion”
• “[A]ny []WPA claim made by an employee working under a CBA is almost by definition intertwined with an interpretation of the CBA and therefore preempted.”
• “[A]ny in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the parties, without respect to the amount in controversy or without regard to the citizenship of the parties. 29 U.S.C. § 185(a
• “[I]ntentional discrimination is not required to prove a failure to accommodate [claim].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).