Carmichael v. United States Parole Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an inmate’s “loss of liberty . . . [was] due to his Maryland state convictions . . . [and] [u]ntil the warrant is executed and he is in custody as a potential parole violator, neither due process . . . nor the USPC regulations, 28 C.F.R. § 2.215(f
• \Should [d]efendant Forrest file a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana?\
• “Should [d]efendant Forrest file a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana?”
• “Until the warrant is executed and [the defendant] is in custody as a (continued . . .
• same, but involving a Maryland state prisoner
• same, but involving a Maryland state prisoner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).