Carmen Jean-Baptiste v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• enjoining the District from discriminating against the plaintiff in the future, even though the “‘alleged’ harasser” and other individuals involved in the discrimination at issue were no longer employed by the relevant agency
• issuing permanent injunction even though defendant no longer employed alleged abuser
• “A permanent injunction barring discrimination against [a] plaintiff imposes little burden on the District.”
• plaintiff is entitled to an award for periods when her anticipated earnings would have exceeded her interim earnings, without any offset for periods when her interim earnings exceeded her anticipated earnings
• employing the period method to DCHRA claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).