Skip to main content
· 12/1/1995

Carmelo Claudio Enrique Maymi v. Robert Snyder, Warden, Delaware Correctional Center M. Jane Brady, Attorney General of the State of Delaware

Citations

  • 68 F.3d 1573

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that phrase “begin [deliberations] anew” does not carry “talismanic power” when other instructions eliminated any disadvantage an alternate juror might have had
  • noting that no federal court has found mid-deliberation substitution to violate either the Sixth or Fourteenth Amendment when the trial court implements procedural safeguards
  • finding “the Supreme Court has not specifically ruled on the constitutionality of substituting an alternate juror after jury deliberations have begun”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Roth, Shadur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.