Skip to main content
· 1/12/2005

Carmel Development Co. v. RLI Insurance

Citations

  • 24 Cal. Rptr. 3d 588
  • 126 Cal. App. 4th 502
  • 2005 Daily Journal DAR 1487
  • 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1100
  • 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • how a policy happens to be labelled is \not dispositive; it is the policy language that controls the attachment of coverage\
  • “Only if the two policies were insuring the same risk at the same level of coverage will we proceed to determine whether the ‘other insurance’ clauses conflicted and thus required equitable pro-ration” of defense or indemnity costs
  • policy was excess over all \scheduled underlying insurance\ and any \unscheduled underlying insurance\
  • ‘‘[t]he inapplicability of secondary coverage until exhaustion of primary limits generally holds true even where there is more underly- ing primary insurance than contemplated by the terms of the secondary policy’’ (internal quotation marks omit- ted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.