Carmack v. National RR Passenger Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the existence of a private right of action has not been finally decided in the First or Fifth Circuits
• granting summary judgment to defendant because plaintiff’s state law claims were preempted by the RLA
• granting summary judgment to defendant because plaintiff’s state law claims were preempted by the RLA
• a “claim of invasion of privacy [was] preempted by the RLA” because “whether or not [the employer] had the right to demand the psychiatric evaluation and psychological testing ‘hinge[d] upon’ an interpretation of the CBA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).