Skip to main content
· 4/19/1971

Carlysle v. Aetna Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 248 So. 2d 64
  • 1971 La. App. LEXIS 6284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is basically unfair for the court to refuse to allow the appellant to respond to a new pleading raising new issues after it was agreed by all that the case was submitted to the court for its consideration (with only the lawyers’ argument left to be submitted[).]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lottinger, Sartain, Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.