Carlund Corp. v. Crown Center Redevelopment

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although a defendant “in its answer did not specifically plead ‘recoupment’ as an affirmative defense, its counterclaim inherently plead[ed] the defense of recoupment”
• noting, but not addressing, party’s argument on appeal that under Section 492.014, a contractor hold funds paid to them “in trust” for the benefit of the subcontractors and suppliers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).