Carlucci & Legum, LLP v. Murray (In Re Murray)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that debtor lied under oath at trial but holding that only misrepresentations in the schedules and not those at trial are not cognizable under section 727(a)(4)(A)
• “[Hjolding a working-class debtor who earns less than $50,000 a year to a standard of disclosure that only the most conscientious accountant could satisfy is a counsel of perfection, and cannot sensibly be the operative meaning of section 727(a)(4).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).