Court of Appeals of Virginia· 3/17/1992

Carlton v. Paxton

Citations

14 Va. App. 105
415 S.E.2d 600
8 Va. Law Rep. 2405
1992 Va. App. LEXIS 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reversing a judgment where the record did not show strict compliance with the statute
appellant proved that the trial judge misapplied the law governing notice by publication by requiring only substantial compliance rather than strict compliance with the statute
an appellate court may rely on facts outlined in the trial court’s written decision in the absence of a transcript or written statement of facts filed by the parties
“[T]he error goes to identification of the order being appealed. Neither the Rules nor prior case decisions mandate dismissal of an appeal when an error of reference and not timely filing is at issue.”
“The record here contains neither a transcript nor a written statement of facts; it does include the trial court’s opinion letter . . . in which the court sets out in extensive detail the facts which, ultimately, stand as the basis for this appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barrow, Elder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Carlton v. Paxton

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.