Carlton v. Black

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a new action “makes it possible for parties other than those already appearing in the ‘existing judicial proceeding’ to contest the will”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cleveland v. Duke
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 31×
• In Re Estate of Kordon
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-07-24· cited 28×
• In re the Parenting Plan of Hall
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-08-26· cited 8×
• In Re Estate of Black
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-15· cited 7×
• In Re The Estate Of Richard D. Kolesar
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-07-03· cited 1×
• Carlton v. Black
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-12-02

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Mauerman v. SUP'R CT. FOR THURSTON CTY.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1954-06-04· cited 44×
• Carlton v. Black
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-15· cited 42×
• In Re Estate of Black
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-15· cited 37×
• River Park Square, L.L.C. v. Miggins
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-02-15· cited 37×
• Gibson v. Superior Court for Pierce County
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1971-03-01· cited 24×
• In Re the Estate of Palucci
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-05-28· cited 19×
• In the Matter of Estate of Van Dyke
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-05-22· cited 19×
• In Re Estate of Shaughnessy
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-06-27· cited 18×
• Makins Produce Co. v. Callison
  Washington Supreme Court· 1912-03-11· cited 5×