Carlton Mills Co. v. Manocraft Clothes, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where terminated firefighters alleged that the administrative procedures leading to their termination were biased and contrary to law, due process was satisfied by a “minimal” hearing followed by a “wholly adequate post-deprivation” Article 78 hearing
• “An Article 78 proceeding therefore constitutes a wholly adequate post-deprivation hearing for due process purposes”
• “An Article 78 proceeding . . . constitutes 8 a wholly adequate post-deprivation hearing for due process purposes.”
• “An Article 78 proceeding . . . constitutes a wholly adequate post-deprivation hearing for due process purposes.”
• “A denial by a district court of a claim of qualified immunity—to the extent that it turns on an issue of law—is a collateral order subject to immediate appeal.”
• collecting cases reaching same conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).