Carlson v. Warren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, instead of a presumption of undue influence, a party must prove both a confidential relationship on the facts and that the parties did not deal on equal terms
• holding plaintiffs failed to submit evidence of a confidential relationship in fact sufficient to survive summary judgment
• affirming summary judgment on undue influence; record did not show beneficiaries had a fiduciary relationship with decedent
• fiduciary relationships include attorney and client, guardian and ward, principal and agent, pastor and parishioner, and parent and child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).