Skip to main content
· 10/15/2007

Carlson v. US Postal Service

Citations

  • 504 F.3d 1123
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 24100
  • 2007 WL 2983702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that information is of “a commercial nature” under the Postal Service Act merely “because it has value”
  • assuming without deciding that the statutory good business exception falls within Exemption 3
  • assuming without deciding that the statutory good business exception falls within Exemption 3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leonard Schaitman and Anthony A. Yang

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.