· 10/15/2007
Carlson v. US Postal Service
Citations
- 504 F.3d 1123
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 24100
- 2007 WL 2983702
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument that information is of “a commercial nature” under the Postal Service Act merely “because it has value”
- assuming without deciding that the statutory good business exception falls within Exemption 3
- assuming without deciding that the statutory good business exception falls within Exemption 3
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leonard Schaitman and Anthony A. Yang
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.