Carlson v. Renkes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding thirty-day appellate period had not begun because letter issuing opinion did not indicate that opinion was final or inform of appellate procedure
• holding “superior court did not err by treating [appellant’s] complaint as an administrative appeal”
• holding 30-day appeal period had not begun to run where letter did not state that it was a final decision or advise Carlson of his right to appeal within 30 days

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).