Carlson v. Principal Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring “that the sentence is no greater than that which would have been imposed if the prejudicial error had not been committed”
• the Court of Military Review must assess a sentence no greater than that which would have been adjudged absent the error
• “Indeed, had we believed that this credit already had been taken into account in the 2 United States v. Zarbatany, No. 11-0165/AF reduction of sentence originally ordered by the Court of Military Review, there would have been no occasion for further action by that court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).