Skip to main content
· 2/5/1993

Carlson v. Mutual Service Insurance

Citations

  • 494 N.W.2d 885
  • 1993 Minn. LEXIS 69
  • 1993 WL 23875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding special circumstances where agent and insured had familial relationship, celebrated holidays and family gatherings together, and insured relied on agent for all insurance needs and for insurance advice
  • finding special circumstances where agent and insured had familial relationship, celebrated holidays and family gatherings together, and insured relied on agent for all insurance needs and for insurance advice
  • agent had no duty to offer UM coverage to insureds upon renewal, where policy application showed that coverage had been offered and rejected when policy was originally purchased

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coyne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.