Carlson v. Inacom Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \I decline to find that attendance is an essential element ... because [the company had] no policy on unscheduled absenteeism\
• employee, who was terminated for excessive absenteeism, did not make a prima facie showing that employer failed to provide reasonable accommodation, where the employee .did not explain to her employer that she suffered from a disability, i.e., migraines, and needed accommodation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).