Carlson v. Hood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting photographs which have been excluded from evidence to go into jury room is reversible error if they were of such a character as to influence the jury
• permitting photographs which have been excluded from evidence to go into jury room is reversible error if they were of such a character as to influence the jury
• acquisition of prescriptive easement does not differ from that of adverse possession with respect to element of adverseness (citing Rollins v. Blackden, 112 Me. 459, 464—65, 92 A. 521, 525 (1914))
• one letter sufficient evidence of nonacquiescence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).