Carlson v. Doekson Gross, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “when the designation of the named insured is in the form ‘Individual dba ...’ the individual is the named insured, irrespective of whatever language follows the ‘dba’ ”
• holding that individual is the named insured, regardless of language following a “dba”
• concluding a “dba” designation does not exclude or limit coverage absent specific exclusion limiting coverage
• concluding a “dba” designation does not exclude or limit coverage absent specific exclusion limiting coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).