Carlson v. Century Surety Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the same in connection with a case that was also related to an underlying foreclosure proceeding
• “[T]he Court may consider outside documents subject to judicial notice, including . . . matters of public record.”
• “[T]he Court may consider outside documents subject to judicial notice, including court documents and matters of public record.” (citing Tal v. Hogan, 453 F.3d 1244, 1265 n.24 (10th Cir. 2006))
• ‘‘[T]hese claims arose prior to the ... proceeding and ‘are not an attack on the [state court] judgment or [state court] proceedings... but rather claims that could have been brought regardless of what occurred at the state-court level.”
• “C.R.S. § 4–9–210 does not appear to create a private right of action. Instead, it allows a debtor to obtain from a secured party information about the secured obligation and the collateral in which the secured party may claim a security interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).