· 2/7/1994
Carlson v. Bubash
Citations
- 639 A.2d 458
- 432 Pa. Super. 514
- 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 374
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[The a]ppellant first contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the court erred in characterizing the jury’s award as a permissible compromise verdict.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Chullo, Montgomery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.