Carlson v. Board of Regents of the Regency Universities System

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) apply to all persons proceeding IFP and are not limited to prisoner suits
• stating that “contrary to plaintiffs’ arguments on appeal, the provisions of 28 provisions allow dismissal without service”
• finding that a plaintiff’s history of abusive litigation supported a determination of maliciousness
• finding that a plaintiff’s history of abusive litigation supported a determination of maliciousness
• stating that “contrary to plaintiffs’ arguments on appeal, the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) apply to all persons proceeding IFP and are not limited to prisoner suits, and the provisions allow dismissal without service”
• stating that “contrary to plaintiffs’ arguments on appeal, the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) apply to all persons proceeding IFP and are not limited to prisoner suits, and the provisions allow dismissal without service”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).