CARLSON v. A. & P. Corrugated Box Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a negligent defendant bears the burden of showing an “act of God” would have caused the injury independently of his negligence
• where tortfeasors are guilty of concurrent negligence each is responsible for full amount of damages on theory that but for its negligence none of the damages would have been sustained
• where tortfeasors are guilty of concurrent negligence each is responsible for full amount of damages on theory that but for its negligence none of the damages would have been sustained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).