Carlson Plywood Co. v. Vytex Plastics Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the intent to make mandatory is unmistakable when ‘shall . . . unless’ language is used[;] “[s]hould . . . unless” language is clearly [m]ore advisory”
• noting that the “‘[s]hould . . . unless’ language is clearly [m]ore advisory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).