Skip to main content
· 2/24/1898

Carlson Bros v. Van de Vanter

Citations

  • 19 Wash. 32
  • 52 P. 323
  • 1898 Wash. LEXIS 311

Syllabus

<p>APPEAL — EXTENSION OF TIME FOE FILING BRIEFS — JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL — FAILURE TO FURNISH SECURITY FOR COSTS — FOREIGN WITNESSES — MILEAGE.</p> <p>An extension of time given appellant by stipulation, in which to file his brief,would not excuse respondent from filing his answering brief within the time prescribed by the rules of court, unless an extension of time had also been accorded the latter by stipulation.</p> <p>A judgment dismissing an action is warranted, when plaintiff has failed to comply with an order of the court requiring him to give security for costs on the ground of non-residence.</p> <p>A witness from outside the state, who attends a trial for the purpose of testifying in the ease, is entitled to mileage within the borders of the state.</p>

Judges: Dunbab

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.