Carlsen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]n criminal statutes, when necessary to give effect to any part of a statute or to the intention of the legislature, the word ‘and’ may be substituted for ‘or’ and vice versa”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hoiengs v. County of Adams
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1994-05-13· cited 249×
• Ledwith v. Bankers Life Insurance
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1952-07-18· cited 61×
• In re Interest of LeVanta S.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2016-12-02· cited 49×
• State v. Wester
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2005-02-04· cited 44×
• Carlsen v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1935-05-17· cited 23×
• Rapid Film Service, Inc. v. Bee, Line Motor Freight
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1966-11-25· cited 12×
• Jungclaus v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1960-07-08· cited 9×
• First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Sioux Falls v. Union Bank & Trust
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-04-16· cited 9×
• Sledge v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1942-10-30· cited 9×
• People v. Wright
  California Court of Appeal· 1955-02-15· cited 4×
• Niemann v. Zacharias
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1970-04-24· cited 3×
• G. Kay, Inc. v. Nebraska Public Service Commission
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1985-01-04· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weinecke v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1892-02-17· cited 35×
• Morearty v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1896-01-09· cited 9×
• Uerling v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1933-10-06· cited 8×