Carlos Urquilla-Diaz v. Kaplan University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs “failure to include the adverb solely—a word with no talismanic power—is not enough to preclude the inference that he pleaded a plausible violation of the False Claims Act”
• holding that existence of scienter is a jury question
• affirming dismissal with prejudice of relator’s FCA qui tam action under Rule 12(b)(6) and modifying judgment to be without prejudice to the United States
• considering the defendant’s efforts to comply with the Rehabilitation Act as evidence that the defendant took its obligations seriously
• affirming dismissal of the plaintiff’s second amended FCA complaint with prejudice
• \ Rule 9(b) provides that a party alleging fraud 'must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud' but may allege scienter generally.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).