Carlos J. Velarde v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no Confrontation Clause violation when defendant not permitted to introduce out-of-court statements indicating that witness perjured himself in testimony that was “incidental” to conviction
• “[T]rial counsel … can hardly be expected to challenge … his own ineffectiveness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).