Skip to main content
· 6/21/2024

Carlos Inestroza-Tosta v. Attorney General United States of America

Citations

  • 105 F.4th 499

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that where appellant was allowed to question jurors regarding the substance of the restricted questions, albeit in a different form, there was no abuse of discretion
  • finding that where appellant was allowed to question jurors regarding the substance of the restricted questions, albeit in a different form, there was no abuse of discretion
  • distinguishing between court's regulation of particular form of question and that of area of inquiry
  • distinguishing between court’s regulation of particular form of question and that of area of inquiry
  • distinguishing between court’s regulation of particular form of question and that of area of inquiry
  • when reviewing the trial court's discretion, this Court will consider the sheer length of the trial and the amount of evidence presented to the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.