· 6/21/2024
Carlos Inestroza-Tosta v. Attorney General United States of America
Citations
- 105 F.4th 499
Oral argument
- ListenArgued47 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that where appellant was allowed to question jurors regarding the substance of the restricted questions, albeit in a different form, there was no abuse of discretion
- finding that where appellant was allowed to question jurors regarding the substance of the restricted questions, albeit in a different form, there was no abuse of discretion
- distinguishing between court's regulation of particular form of question and that of area of inquiry
- distinguishing between court’s regulation of particular form of question and that of area of inquiry
- distinguishing between court’s regulation of particular form of question and that of area of inquiry
- when reviewing the trial court's discretion, this Court will consider the sheer length of the trial and the amount of evidence presented to the jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.