Skip to main content
· 4/1/2005

Carlos Gallo-Vasquez v. United States

Citations

  • 402 F.3d 793
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5234
  • 2005 WL 736261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that defendant must provide concrete evidence that a favorable plea offer would have been available to him
  • holding failure to use interpreter not ineffective assistance where record indicated petitioner understood English
  • affirming denial of evidentiary hearing where defendant made only “vague and conclusory allegations” regarding plea agreement that he rejected based on advice of counsel
  • “[C]ounsel's performance may fall below the minimum threshold if he advises his client to reject a plea bargain in the face of overwhelming evidence of guilt and an absence of viable defenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.