Carlos Galaviz-Medina v. Tom Wooten, Warden, Fci, Florence, Co, and U.S. Immigration Review Board of Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a detainer usually only serves as a notice to prison authorities that the INS is 2 going to be making a decision about the deportability of the alien in the future
• evaluating petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in light of the judicial review framework established by INA § 106(a)
• evaluating petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in light of the judicial review framework established by INA § 106(a)
• noting almost all circuit courts considering the issue have determined lodging a detainer, without more, is insufficient to render an immigrant in custody
• Circuit Courts of Appeal have exclusive jurisdiction over judicial review of all final actions of deportation
• “[A]n alien whose liberty is restricted pursuant to an order emanating from the INS is ‘in custody’ for purposes of satisfying the prerequisites of habeas review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).