Carlos Chapa v. Jura Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that drug abuser was not “otherwise qualified” for No. 11‐1889 Page 4 substance‐abuse program due to violent tendencies
• holding that § 290dd-2 does not create a private cause of action for damages
• noting that the purpose of the federal regulations is to fight the country’s drug problem, primarily by encouraging voluntary treatment, and recognizing that addicts are more likely to seek treatment if it is provided confidentially
• noting that the purpose of the federal regulations is to fight the country’s drug problem, primarily by encouraging voluntary treatment, and recognizing that addicts are more likely to seek treatment if it is provided confidentially
• explaining that private rights of action are rarely implied in criminal statutes
• explaining that private rights of action are rarely implied in criminal statutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).