CARLOS CADAVID v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the alternative method of relief for violations of prisoner’s First Amendment rights provide by the BOP grievance process
• explaining that, since Bivens, Davis, and Carlson, “[s]ubsequent developments leave [the plaintiff] with a forbidding hill to climb”
• explaining that since Bivens, Davis, and Carlson, “[s]ubsequent developments leave [the plaintiff] with a forbidding hill to climb”
• observing that since Bivens, Davis, and Carlson, “[s]ubsequent developments leave [the plaintiff] with a forbidding hill to climb”
• concluding the PLRA is a special factor because “‘[l]egislative action suggesting that Congress does not want a damages remedy’ counsels against judicial do-it- yourself projects’” (quoting Abbasi, 582 U.S. at 148)
• applying special factors analysis in declining to recognize a Bivens right of action for a prisoner’s claim his First Amendment rights were violated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).