Carlos A. Quinonez v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the pleading need not list “with evidentiary specificity the acts complained of,” but it “must comprehend a so-called prima facie case”
• loss of an opportunity to perform work is an “injury to business”
• plaintiff who was fired by securities dealer and was unable to find employment with another securities dealer because of agreement among dealer firms not to hire an employee who was discharged by another firm suffered sufficient injury to proceed with antitrust claim
• restraints on movement of labor force in securities industry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).