Skip to main content
· 4/23/1912

Carlitz v. Briggs

Citations

  • 50 Pa. Super. 67
  • 1912 Pa. Super. LEXIS 7

Syllabus

<p>Landlord and tenant — Principal and agent — Trespass against agent.</p> <p>A tenant has no standing to maintain an action of trespass against the agent of his landlord on the ground that the latter directed another person to break into and enter upon the demised premises, and because such person had prevented the plaintiff from removing his goods, when the evidence shows that the agent had merely given to such other person by the direction of the owner a lease on the premises; that the term of such lease did not go into effect until after the acts of which the plaintiff complained; that the agent had given no directions to the new tenant; and that at the time of the acts complained of the old tenant was in default for rent, and the landlord had a right to determine the lease.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where no document defines the dimensions of an ancient road, the “precise width, in what precise direction, and precisely how much surface of land, is thus appropriated . . . must be inferred from circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.