Carlisle v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that motion in limine is preliminary ruling because trial courts typically are not in position to rule on admissibility of evidence before trial starts
• noting that motion was suppression motion because it requested that evidence be entirely excluded rather than requesting that State approach and inform trial court before it intended to offer evidence
• motion that sought to exclude outcry witness’s testimony about details of offense was not a motion in limine because it sought to exclude specific evidence from one particular witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dickerson
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-10-21· cited 30×
• Lafayette v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-09· cited 19×
• State v. Atkinson
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2017-12-07· cited 6×
• Joeric Francisco Dority v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2021-07-22
• The State of Texas v. Robert Chody
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2023-05-18
• The State of Texas v. Jason Nassour
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2023-07-13