· 12/15/2009
Carlisle v. Rainbow Connection, Inc.
Citations
- 300 S.W.3d 583
- 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1768
- 2009 WL 4824433
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If a party does not support contentions with relevant authority or argument beyond conclusory statements, the point is deemed abandoned.”
- “A recitation of the law even when correct is improper in the [s]tatement of [f]acts portion of the brief, and is a violation of Rule 84.04(c).” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dowd, Sullivan, Cohen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.