Skip to main content
· 12/15/2009

Carlisle v. Rainbow Connection, Inc.

Citations

  • 300 S.W.3d 583
  • 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1768
  • 2009 WL 4824433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If a party does not support contentions with relevant authority or argument beyond conclusory statements, the point is deemed abandoned.”
  • “A recitation of the law even when correct is improper in the [s]tatement of [f]acts portion of the brief, and is a violation of Rule 84.04(c).” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dowd, Sullivan, Cohen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.