Carlisle Corp. v. Uresco Construction Materials, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a distributorship agreement was separate from invoices where it did not provide for the specific shipment or payment of materials and created only a potential for future sales rather than a right to payment
• distributor agreement that “broadly set[] forth payment terms and the right of termination” merely “created a potential for future sales” with actual quantities and prices set by the purchase order and invoice
• describing section 2-717 as permitting offsets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).