Carlisle Chemical Works, Inc. v. Hardman & Holden Limited

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing dismissal of oppositions to registration of COZIRC based on use of ZIRCO for related goods, finding that the marks “are substantially similar, the difference being in a reversal of syllables which are essentially the same”
• reversing dismissal of oppositions to registration of COZIRC based on use of ZIRCO for related goods, finding that the marks “are substantially similar, the difference being in a reversal of syllables which are essentially the same”
• “That the relevant class of buyers may exercise care does not necessarily impose on that class the responsibility of distinguishing between similar trademarks for similar goods. ‘Human memories even of discriminating purchasers . . . are not infallible.”’
• “Human memories even of discriminating purchasers ... are not infallible.”
• “Human memories even of discriminating purchasers ... are not infallible.”
• “Human memories even of discriminating purchasers ... are not infallible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).