Carlino v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Courts have uniformly held that a constructive trust is a fraud-rectifying remedy rather than an intent-enforcing one.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Courts have uniformly held that a constructive trust is a fraud‐rectifying remedy rather than an intent‐enforcing one.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).