Skip to main content
· 9/18/1980

Carlingswitch, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 500 F. Supp. 223
  • 85 Cust. Ct. 63
  • 85 Ct. Cust. 63
  • 1980 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that neither importer’s voluntary tender of mitigated penalty, nor Customs subsequent refusal to refund monies tendered, was an “exaction” under 19 U.S.C. § 1514 for purposes of establishing jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maletz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.