· 9/18/1980
Carlingswitch, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 500 F. Supp. 223
- 85 Cust. Ct. 63
- 85 Ct. Cust. 63
- 1980 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1172
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that neither importer’s voluntary tender of mitigated penalty, nor Customs subsequent refusal to refund monies tendered, was an “exaction” under 19 U.S.C. § 1514 for purposes of establishing jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maletz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.