Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/15/1957
Carlin v. Fischer
Citations
- 129 A.2d 827
- 212 Md. 526
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in suit for existing claims only, a party is not required to sue for all amounts owing when contract is divisible or breach partial
- second suit for fees from legal services rendered to estate barred
- “[a] judgment or decree in a suit for a part only of a single cause of action or entire claim permits res judicata to be successfully relied on if the remainder is sued on later”
- “[T]here is substantial unanimity that even if the contract is divisible, all that is due under it, or by reason of its breach, at the time suit is brought, must then be sued for, or the right to so much as is due but not sued for will be lost.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brune, Collins, Henderson, Hammond, Prescott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-09-07· cited 160×
- Bankers & Shippers Insurance v. Electro Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-04· cited 95×
- Jones v. SpeedCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-08-02· cited 27×
- Siu Leung Shum v. GaudreauCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-08-31· cited 26×
- Levin v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-04-16· cited 25×
- Frontier Van Lines, Inc. v. Maryland Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-05-07· cited 21×
- Bolte v. Aits, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1978-12-08· cited 20×
- Corby v. McCarthyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-30· cited 18×
- Patel v. HealthPlus, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-11-08· cited 15×
- Rolling Inn, Inc. v. IulaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-04-05· cited 8×
- World Wide Imp. Car Co., Ltd. v. Savings Bk. of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-01-16· cited 8×
- Iula v. GrampaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-04-13· cited 6×
- Mildred Davis, Inc. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-04-04· cited 5×
- Gelblum v. BloomCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-05-28· cited 4×
- Yuen v. DurhamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-03-05· cited 2×
- Prince George's County v. BrentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-03-27· cited 1×
- Lease-a-Car, Inc. v. Thomassen Lincoln Mercury, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-06-10· cited 1×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Olmstead v. BachCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1893-10-05· cited 43×
- Whitehurst v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1873-07-03· cited 37×
- Royston v. HornerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1892-03-16· cited 29×
- Buck v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1886-10-04· cited 19×
- State v. RamsburgCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1875-12-10· cited 19×
- Le John Mfg. Co. v. WebbDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1952-09-19· cited 14×
- Pugh v. WaclawskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-31· cited 14×
- Gottlieb v. Fred. W. Wolf Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1891-12-17· cited 14×
- Talbert v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-17· cited 12×
- Meyers v. JosselynCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-10-01· cited 9×
- Chapman v. Potomac Chemical Co.D.C. Circuit· 1947-01-27· cited 7×
- Renshaw v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1892-03-16· cited 7×
- Ahl v. AhlCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1883-05-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.