Carlin Communications, Inc. v. The Mountain States Telephone And Telegraph Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• carrier’s ban on IP’s sexually explicit speech was a product of independent business judgment because carrier was “free” to extend service to IP and “immunize[d] from state pressure” to restrict IP’s access

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).